> > Hi, > > > > first, I'm all in for increasing the defaults and currently TLSv1.2 > > as a default makes complete sense to me for 1.4 branch. > > Hi, > > I agree it makes sense to provide up to date security level out of > the > box in a new major version. > Regarding upgrade I think we should be conservative and keep the > security at the level the instance was running.
If the admin has set a value, then we will respect it. :) So I think this is accounted for. Thanks! -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CS5HHHFIDW3A3NLXD7BLWOGSSLOTASOV/
