> On 26 Feb 2019, at 12:58, Anuj Borah <abo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> @William Brown
> 
> ACI syntax in test is correct,  it meant to give access to (mail = * ) only 
> not any thing else . In the same case as mansion bellow:

Ummm, that’s not what I’m saying? I’m saying that you may *only* be giving 
access to the mail attribute, so as a result when the .filter generates and 
expands to (&(objectClass=account)(mail=*)), the objectClass is denied on the 
searcch, causing the test to fail (to prevent disclosure).

That’s why I suggest changing the aci to allowing mail AND objectClass, and 
testing again. I think this is atn aci issue not a python, and I’d like to rule 
out that first. 

> 
> Domain(topo.standalone, DEFAULT_SUFFIX).replace("aci", 
> '(target="ldap:///{}";)(targetattr="mail")(version 3.0; acl "Test";allow 
> (read,search,compare) (userdn = "ldap:///anyone";); )'.format(DEFAULT_SUFFIX))
>     
>     conn = Anonymous(topo.standalone).bind()
>     # filter does not works with Anonymous
>     assert 0 == Accounts(conn, DEFAULT_SUFFIX).filter('(mail=*)')   -----  It 
> does not work 
>     assert 3 == len(conn.search_s(DEFAULT_SUFFIX, ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE, 
> "mail=*")) ----- it works 
> 
> 
> We can clearly see sarch_s works under conn while ACI access to (mail=*) , in 
> the same condition filter does not work at all . It gives 0 result , while 
> search_s gives 3 . 
> 
>   
> 
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 5:06 AM William Brown <wbr...@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 26 Feb 2019, at 05:09, Anuj Borah <abo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > We have recently implemented Filter and Anonymous to lib389  . But it seems 
> > like Filter does not work with Anonymous connection . 
> > It actually does not work with any kind of connection whether ACI allow or 
> > not  rather than root  .
> > 
> > My suspense is it is related to this issue which is not yet fixed: 
> > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50137
> > 
> > Please check attached test case .
> 
> I suspect they are not related, more likely the access control in your test 
> doesn’t allow anonymous to search objectClass under DEFAULT_SUFFIX. If you 
> change it to:
> 
>     Domain(topo.standalone, DEFAULT_SUFFIX).replace("aci", 
> '(target="ldap:///{}";)(targetattr=“mail || objectClass")(version 3.0; acl 
> "Test";allow (read,search,compare) (userdn = "ldap:///anyone";); 
> )'.format(DEFAULT_SUFFIX))
> 
> (I hope I have the aci syntax correct)
> 
> 
> > 
> > Regards
> > Anuj Borah
> > <test.py>_______________________________________________
> > 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
> —
> Sincerely,
> 
> William Brown
> Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
> SUSE Labs
> _______________________________________________
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

—
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to