On 6/12/19 5:48 AM, William Brown wrote:
On 12 Jun 2019, at 11:27, thierry bordaz <tbor...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 6/12/19 9:22 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi Mark,
On 06/11/2019 08:15 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
I am currently working on a revision of replication agreement status messages.
Previously we logged the status like so:
Error (%d) - message (sub-message) ...
just to get it clear what you suggest, I was a bit confused about first.
Do you talk about logging (as in the error log) or about the value of the
replicaLastUpdateStatus attribute ?
The BZ mention replicaLastUpdateStatus (like "last update status: Error (18)
Replication error acquiring replica: Incremental update transient error. Backing off,
will retry update later. (transient error)")
I agree it is good idea to provide a json status. Should it replaces the "human
readable" format with a json format I would prefer to be compatible with a new
status attribute replicaLastUpdateStatusJson.
This could be an excellent approach to support a human and json status in
parallel - given that we can very cheaply provide both, and then we satisfy a
broader range of consumers. Great idea, I support this.
Ludwig, just to clarify I am not referring to logging but to the status
attribute in the agreement entry: replicaLastUpdateStatus
Going back to the topic at hand, it looks like the consensus is both
text and JSON :-) Improve existing text messages (use Error (%d),
Warning (%d), and Info), and then add a second attribute with a JSON
text string that can be parsed by clients. I will write up a design doc
and send it out for review...
theirry
For logging into the error log I prefer to keep the current, "readable" format
- until we do a real rework of logging.
For the storage of a state in the agreement I think switching to the json
object is ok
If Error was set to 0 it meant success, but this caused confusion because of the word
"Error". So I am working on changing this.
There are two options here: change the static "Error" text to be dynamic: "Info",
"Warning", or "Error" depending on the state. Or, move away from a human friendly text string to a
machine friendly simple JSON object. There are pro's and con's to both. I think moving towards a JSON object is the
correct way - easier to maintain, and easier to be consumed by other applications. The cons are that it is a disruptive
change to the previous behavior, and it could be confusing to an Admin who might not understand JSON.
This is the basic JSON object I was thinking of
{"status": "Good|Warning|Bad", "status code": NUMBER(aka error code), "date":
"2019117485748745Z", "message": "Message text"}
or maybe multiple messages (list):
{"status": "Good|Warning|Bad", "status code": NUMBER(aka error code), "date": "2019117485748745Z",
"message": ["the replication status is...", "Connection error 91", "Server Down"]}
The JSON object can easily be extended without breaking clients, but it's not
easy to read for a human.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Mark
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
