> On Mar 9, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Noriko Hosoi <nho...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > On 03/09/2015 02:18 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: >> I'm in the same boat. We, as an enterprise, have standardized on RHEL6 as >> our OS, with RHEL7 only on the horizon. Switching to either Fedora or >> CentOS isn't an option. But the only "official" 389 release for RHEL6 is >> years old. >> >> I reported a bug about a year ago, 47739, that's been fixed since 1.2.11.26. >> But only 1.2.11.15 is available for RHEL6. So, yes, there's at least one >> fix that we need that isn't available to us. But really, there's tons of >> bug fixes and features that have come out since then. The longer we're held >> back, the harder it will be to get our user base to adapt to all the new >> features once we do upgrade. > The fix for the ticket 47739 is included in 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-32 and > newer and released on October 13, 2014 for RHEL-6.6. > > Sorry about missing the announcement. Could it be possible to upgrade your > RHEL6 bits to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6? >
Ok, so the EL6 dash releases have fixes for stuff that isn’t in the base 1.2.11.15 release. Is that detailed somewhere? Yes, I can upgrade to -50, but I and my managers would want to know what’s changed.
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
