On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:04 AM Ludwig <lkris...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/24/2019 10:34 PM, William Brown wrote:
> >
> >> On 25 Jan 2019, at 10:08, Mark Reynolds <mreyno...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/24/19 3:35 PM, Mihai Carabas wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:17 PM Mark Reynolds <mreyno...@redhat.com> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> On 1/24/19 1:54 PM, Mihai Carabas wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> [root@ldap ~]# dsctl slapd-ldap db2ldif --replication cursdb cursdb.ldif
> >>>>
> >>>> cursdb.ldif doesn't seem to contain any replication related info. What
> >>>> should contain related to replication?
> >>>>
> >>>> You should at least see an entry with "dn: 
> >>>> nsuniqueid=ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff-ffffffff", if you don't see this 
> >>>> entry in the LDIF then it might not be working (sigh).  You can then use 
> >>>> the legacy tool:
> >>>>
> >>> Is there. All is ok.
> >>>
> >>> After exporting LDIF and importing again, the search still is buggy.
> >>>
> >> Yeah this is looking like a known bug that we will be working on soon…
> > Looking at the entryid and indexes, everything seems correct, so this does 
> > seem like a bug. Have we got an issue id Mark?
> I think it is: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50103, the fix is not
> yet ready

I am a little confused. I have read the issue: is this issue about my
ldapsearch problem or about the reindex problem?
>
> you can repair it by explicitely reindexing the entryrdn index. ..... -t
> entryrdn

Why on entryrdn will work? When you say entryrdn in my case, you are
refering at what rdn?

Thank you and sorry for the dumb questions,
Mihai

> >
> >> Question, would you be willing to try a "special logging" build to see we 
> >> can figure out why the reindex task is hanging?  The stacktraces did not 
> >> show anything helpful, so we need to see which entry is causing the issue 
> >> and the easiest way, besides walking you through using gdb (which I would 
> >> be willing to do), would be to provide a special build that logs extra 
> >> info to the errors log.   I know that is a lot to ask, so no worries if 
> >> you aren't comfortable with it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mark
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >> List Archives: 
> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > —
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > William Brown
> > Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
> > SUSE Labs
> > _______________________________________________
> > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to