> On 22 May 2019, at 21:23, Angel Bosch <abo...@ticmallorca.net> wrote: > > replying to myself to clarify the original doubt: > > executing something like this on master1 machine: > > dsconf master1 repl-agmt create --suffix dc=global --host slave1.example.net > --port 389 --conn-protocol LDAP --bind-dn cn=repmanager,cn=config > --bind-passwd XXXXXXXX --bind-method SIMPLE master1-to-slave1 > > will create replication agreement as described in 15.2.4. of official docs > AND will modify nsslapd-state and nsslapd-referral on slave1 as described in > 15.2.2. so you don't need to manually perform that last step on consumers.
Yep, that sounds correct. > > > > and I would like to note too that enabling replication with dsconf will also > create replication manager if you specify --bind-passwd so you save an extra > step. > the command should be something like this: > > dsconf master1 replication enable --suffix dc=global --role master > --replica-id 666 --bind-dn "cn=repmanager,cn=config" --bind-passwd YYYYYYY Ahhhh that's also a surprise .... but glad that it works ... > > > I'll leave all this here just in case any other script lover needs to modify > their recipes. > > that being said, I love those new tools! they can need some polishing but > dsconf and dsctl are awesome! Really happy you like them! If you have feedback or improvements to suggest, please always let us know. :D > > > good job! > > abosch > > ----- Missatge original ----- >> De: "Angel Bosch" <abo...@ticmallorca.net> >> Per: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project." >> <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org> >> Enviats: Dimecres, 22 de Maig 2019 9:32:30 >> Assumpte: [389-users] Re: referral on update equivalent with dsconf >> >>> which is why the cli tools were misleading you here sadly. I think >>> we as a team, need to review and understand what happened here to >>> cause them to mislead a person about their function. :( >>> >>> Sorry that this confusion occured. Does my answer help? >>> >> >> sure! you're answers are always very deep and insightful. >> >> for me the main problem is that new DS 1.4 is right here but docs are >> still about 1.3 and I'm trying to translate my scripts and recipes. >> >> I was using some kind of old wrappers to install, configure and >> launch my instances and I'm struggling with new tools. >> >> that being said, I love those new tools! they can need some polishing >> but dsconf and dsctl are awesome! >> >> keep it this way guys! >> >> >> abosch >> _______________________________________________ >> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >> List Guidelines: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > _______________________________________________ > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
