> On 1 Apr 2020, at 05:14, Mark Reynolds <mreyno...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/30/20 5:54 PM, William Brown wrote:
>> 
>>> On 31 Mar 2020, at 01:14, Laurent GUERBY <laur...@guerby.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Mon, 2020-03-30 at 09:16 +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 2020-03-29 at 20:15 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Second, 1.4.0 is dead and
>>>>> has not been maintained in a very long time so the UI is probably
>>>>> very
>>>>> unstable in that version.  Please use 389-ds-base-1.4.1 or higher.
>>>> I checked and the backport repo for debian 10 (buster) doesn't
>>>> have a more recent version than 1.4.0.
>>>> 
>>>> Is anyone maintaining a repository with a more recent version
>>>> than 1.4.0 for debian ?
>>> Debian unstable has 1.4.3 so I installed:
>>> 
>>> # tail -1 /etc/apt/sources.list
>>> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main
>>> 
>>> # apt-get install 389-ds/unstable cockpit/unstable
>>> 
>>> Ran :
>>> 
>>> dscreate interactive
>>> 
>>> cockpit 389 tab showed:
>>> 
>>> "There is no 389-ds-base package installed on this system. Sorry there
>>> is nothing to manage..."
>>> 
>>> 20200330 16:50:15<mreynolds> you should see the command that
>>> failed.  Its trying to do "rpm -q 389-ds-base"
>>> 20200330 17:02:04<vashirov> ln -sf /usr/bin/true /usr/bin/rpm
>> Mark, I think we should make this a bug. Instead of checking for 'rpm -q 
>> ...' here, a better option could be to check for defaults.inf, or even to 
>> make a subcommand for dsctl or something that show's installed codebases. 
>> This will affect freebsd etc, and could be a good way to handle it instead. 
>> :)
> 
> I already removed this rpm check.  It's currently under review as part of the 
> UI fix patch which you have already partially reviewed.

Wow look at you go, fixing stuff so fast :D

Thanks so much, I'll finish that review up today, and again, thanks Laurent for 
contacting us. Please let us know if we can help you in any other ways :) 

> 
> Mark
> 
>> 
>> Thanks Laurent, appreciate your patience with this!
>> 
>> 
>>> After this small hack everything worked.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the help!
>>> 
>>> Laurent
>>> 
>> —
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> William Brown
>> 
>> Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
>> SUSE Labs
>> _______________________________________________
>> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
> -- 
> 
> 389 Directory Server Development Team
> 

—
Sincerely,

William Brown

Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to