On 6/23/2020 9:34 AM, Emmanuel Kasprzyk wrote:
I am working on large Directory Server topology, which is reaching
very fast the amount of available locks in BDB ( cf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831812 )
- Can the planned switch in 389-ds-base-1.4.next to LMDB help for such
cases ?
( Especially after reading "The database structure is multi-versioned
so readers run with no locks" on http://www.lmdb.tech/doc/index.html )
Probably better to fix the bug in DS that cases it to run a long running
transaction with repeatable reads isolation?
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
