> On 28 Jan 2021, at 06:50, Mark Reynolds <mreyno...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 1/27/21 2:57 PM, Angel Bosch wrote: >>> Again I think you are looking at the older version of the server. >>> >> >> >> ok, I understand. >> >> I see that version 2 is already out. >> Can I expect additional changes in dsconf interface or will you try to >> mantain a stable set of parameters? > Great question. There are no plans to change the "dsconf" interface. But, > I'd like to make some improvements to the "dsctl" command. Some of the > functions in dsctl (ldif2db, db2ldif, etc) do not follow the same design that > dsconf uses. So I want to improve this in 2.0.x, to be more consistent with > dsconf. But there are no plans to change "dsconf", or "dsidm". >> >> As sysadmin I create a lot of script to install/manage services and is >> confusing having commands that change that often.
You may find it "more stable" to use lib389 directly rather than the CLI then. I think the team should talk about the CLI having an "interface guarantee", and today I don't think I personally would want to commit to that (but the team hasn't decided on this). I still see room to change and grow the CLI in ways that may be breaking, but the core of lib389 today seems "pretty stable". > > I think you were using a early version of 1.4.0 btw. I can see in 1.4.0.x we > switched it over to use "retro-changelog" in 389-ds-base-1.4.0.22 via this > commit: > > commit 1f15e966cb8265fb636e12e18ac516bb127c2db0 > Date: Mon Feb 18 22:45:01 2019 +0100 > > So 389-ds-base-1.4.0.21 uses "retrochangelog", and 1.4.0.22 uses > "retro-changelog" > > In 1.4.1 this change landed in: 389-ds-base-1.4.1.2 So anything earlier > than this release is still using "retrochangelog" > >> >> Please take this as a positive criticism :) > > Absolutely, and any suggestions for improvements are always welcome. > > Thanks, > Mark > >> >> abosch >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > -- > > 389 Directory Server Development Team > _______________________________________________ > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs, Australia _______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
