This is described in our documentation:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/12/html/user_management_and_authentication/assembly_disabling-anonymous-binds_user-management-and-authentication

HTH,

Mark

On 7/28/22 10:29 AM, Christian Palacios wrote:
Hi there,

We have an instance of 389 and I have been asked to disable anonymous bind on it because our current security policies don't allow it.  Can you please suggest ways to fix this? Unfortunately, I don't have the admin account, so I'm hoping to also get help with that.

Thank you,
-Christian

_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

--
Directory Server Development Team
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to