> Le 6 mai 2017 à 12:07, Alan Chan via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> a écrit : > > I believe it's true only for non-diacritical operation. However, for > diacritical operation - replace string(*) and position(*), Position(*) is > still faster than replace string.
Hi Alan, since v15R3, using 'Replace string' for count seems always faster to me than 'Position' - even if [compiled+strict comparison] it's quite the same. Could be a detail, but instead of measuring time to loop $i times, I often prefer to count how much iterations are executed during a given time, it makes interpreted/compiled switch easier. All results under are from compiled, all 32b versions except v16 in 64b. <https://screencast.com/t/9TXxsJUH8ooj> The little v12 test base I've used is here: <http://forums.4d.fr/Post//15925184/1/#15925185> -- Arnaud de Montard ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com **********************************************************************
