Crap, it's documented. And, as we all know, 4D doesn't document or discuss things that might change in future versions for fear of frightening the children. But this is documented, so I guess we're safe relying on it as is ;-) ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com **********************************************************************
- RE: Love 4D's math interpretation..... Dennis, Neil via 4D_Tech
- RE: Love 4D's math interpretat... Chip Scheide via 4D_Tech
- Re: Love 4D's math interpr... Jeremy Roussak via 4D_Tech
- Re: Love 4D's math interpr... Chuck Miller via 4D_Tech
- RE: Love 4D's math int... Timothy Penner via 4D_Tech
- Re: Love 4D's math... Tom Dillon via 4D_Tech
- Re: Love 4D's... Sannyasin Siddhanathaswami via 4D_Tech
- RE: Love ... Randy Engle via 4D_Tech
- Re: Love ... Arnaud de Montard via 4D_Tech
- Re: Love ... Wayne Stewart via 4D_Tech
- Re: Love ... David Adams via 4D_Tech
- Re: Love ... Tom Dillon via 4D_Tech
- Re: Love 4D's math interpretation..... Arnaud de Montard via 4D_Tech
- RE: Love 4D's math interpretation..... Tim Nevels via 4D_Tech
- RE: Love 4D's math interpretat... Timothy Penner via 4D_Tech
- RE: Love 4D's math interpretation..... Richard Wright via 4D_Tech
- RE: Love 4D's math interpretat... Dennis, Neil via 4D_Tech