Peter,
Collections are ordered. So just sort the entity selection first.
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 2:40 PM Peter Bozek via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 10:29 PM Christian Sakowski via 4D_Tech <
> 4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
>
> > $object.myIDs:=$entitySelection.toCollection("ID“).extract(„ID“)
> > new process(…;$object)
> >
> > and in the new process just create the new entity selection:
> >
> > ds.Table.query(„ID IN :1“;$object.myIDs)
> >
> >
>
> Christian,
>
> Thanks for idea, will look at it. I want to pass a sorted selection, not
> sure if the above query will work. I have a code that does this with
> interprocess selection, and that works OK, but thought ORDA will provide
> more elegant solution.
>
> I could achieve it with LONGINT ARRAY FROM SELECTION - CREATE SELECTION
> FROM ARRAY commands, and it resembles your suggestion (and the sort order
> will be transferred) but wanted to avoid creating potentially huge array.
> Interprocess named selection seems to have very low overhead (and, BTW, the
> same argument as against shared entity selections can be used against
> interprocess named selections.)
>
> --
>
> Peter Bozek
> **********************************************************************
> 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
> Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
> Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
> Unsub: mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com
> **********************************************************************
--
Kirk Brooks
San Francisco, CA
=======================
*We go vote - they go home*
**********************************************************************
4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
Unsub: mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com
**********************************************************************
