On 11/07/2009 03:21 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi :) > [..] > Someone on LAD asked what timer preferred to use for sequencing. Because > of this happy coincidence I found out, that for the default 64 Studio > 3.0-beta3 kernel the module snd-hrtimer isn't loaded and in addition > that there isn't such a module. > > Okay, because of ... > > $ cat /boot/config-2.6.29-1-multimedia-amd64 | grep HRTIMER > # CONFIG_SND_HRTIMER is not set >
Late follow up.. there's currently some discussion on LAU: quoting http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2010-May/069902.html >> In a different thread you mention, regarding jackd's use of snd-seq: >> the timing behaviour of the two -X options (seq and raw) are not very >> good. some might be sufficiently uncharitable as to call them >> unusable". >> >> Would using snd-hrtimer with snd-seq change this assessment? > > No, they are just badly designed and implemented from this > perspective. They both have substantial jitter built into their > design. _______________________________________________ 64studio-devel mailing list 64studio-devel@lists.64studio.com http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel
