Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Daniel James wrote: > > >> Hi Ralf, >> >> >>> could you please add a JACK debuginfo version to the repository or send >>> it by email? >>> >> There's an open question about whether we will use JACK2 or JACK1 for >> future distros, since JACK 0.118.0 shows that JACK1 development is still >> very much alive. >> >> When jackdmp 1.9.1 was renamed to JACK2 I believed that JACK1 >> development was giving way to the newer C++ implementation, but that >> does not appear to be the case now. >> > > I think he was asking for some manner of libjack-dbg > package so that he could get a sane backtrace. > > -gabriel
You are right, but testing JACK 1 first couldn't harm. If needed I could compile a dbg version for JACK 2 myself, I just was asking because I wish to keep the distro's "default" JACK, instead of compiling a custom distro ;). Cheers! Ralf _______________________________________________ 64studio-devel mailing list 64studio-devel@lists.64studio.com http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel
