I think it might be too similar :) It should be noted that GNOME is also to a certain degree 'familiar' for Mac OS (X) users, not just arbitrary versions of Windows.
GNOME is a good default. Others can be got easily. ----- Original Message ---- From: Grammostola Rosea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: 64studio-users mailing list <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, 27 November, 2008 10:20:13 AM Subject: Re: [64studio-users] Version 3 and lightweight window managers Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Dragan Noveski wrote: > >>> GNOME for me is the happy >>> medium. I don't give a damm on what a Shuttleworth project does, but >>> GNOME seems to be the best choice for everyone. >>> >> well, i am able to come around with gnome too, but it is not the best >> choice for me and probably for some others. so it is not the best >> choice for everyone. >> > > This is a result of my broken English, I noticed this right after I sent > my mail. > It's the best choice for a distro, that will only provide 1 WM/DE to > keep downloads small and fast, because GNOME is the happy medium. It's > not like KDE and it's not like Fluxbox, but it is in the middle and for > usage it's similar to 98se and XP. > Is kde4 not more similar to Windows Vista? And so better for 'windows-converts'? \r _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users Get the world's best email - http://nz.mail.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
