stefano procaccioli wrote: > Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> stefano procaccioli wrote: >> >>> I downloaded from czech and us mirror but the iso are the same and the >>> output too. >>> >>> >>> Any answer? >>> >>> Thank you >>> >>> Stefano >>> >> >> Just to figure out if there might be a bug for the burning or checksum >> tool, if you have a Linux, than in a terminal run >> >> diff /path/to/file/czech_mirror.iso /path/to/file/us_mirror.iso >> >> If they don't differ, than I don't guess they will have the same corrupt >> bits. >> >> Ralf >> >> > > Hi Ralf, thank you for your answer. > > I downloaded again 64studio_2.1_i386.iso from us and czec and run > diff. Nothing, they are exactely the same. > > Do I install also if md5sum tell me that something's wrong? > > What can I do? I have a laptop whith CD-ROM reader (not DVD) the iso > is more than 650 MB: overburn on a 800MB CD? > > > thank you a lot! > > Stefano
I guess that the mirror servers won't be updated every 15 minutes, but only when there will be a new release, so I think that there won't be the same corrupt bits, caused by updates from a broken version of the main server. Yes, you should ignore the wrong checksum. As far as I know, it's not possible to get 2.1 on a CD, even not by overburning. It's not possible to install by the 2.0 Live-CD and the 2.0 Release from the Serbia Mirror seems to be as large as the 2.1. I'm not sure, but I guess it was possible to get it by an overburn. Maybe you should check out if overburning can't damage your drive and if so, try to overburn a CD. A CD isn't that expensive, but I heard that it might be possible to damage some drives. I ignored this and did overburns without any damages, but seldom with success. Ralf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
