Folderol wrote: > I don't understand this at all. > > Certainly on this list I'm not aware of any personality problems. >
There are no problems on this list, but you need to report bugs to other places sometimes and than you can have a lot of problems. A fictive example; your DE has it's own burning application, the burning application is using different applications itself, you get no messages which application failed. Will you report this to the distro developers? The DE developers? The tool developers? The end application developers? At the end and that's not fictive any more, distro, DE, tool , end application are fine, but an IDE kernel modul was broken. You run from pillar to post and will always be abused and you always has to subscribe and learn the rules and search the forums, FAQs etc., before you are allowed to post a bug report. I always tend to check in forums where to post a bug, but you are only wanted, if the moderators can be shure, that they are the gods, if they don't know something you get bashed, to find out yourself what to do. For 64 Studio I've got the problem, that I can't report bugs to the right people, because e.g. you can't report 0.103 bugs from JACK, you need to have 0.116 bugs. Which stable audio distro runs 0.116?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
