Hi Carsten,
My answers are in line.
On 3/22/06, Carsten Bormann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kim,
> 1) Optimization of the Adhoc Routing Protocol for 6lowpans
> 15 minutes
> I would like to present the updated version of LOAD document and
> DYMO-low about the received comments.
The view of the people present at the Interim was that this subject
is very relevant.
When you say "updated", I assume that this is about what has changed
since the Interim?
Your assumption is correct.
Can we split this into:
1) discussion about the way forward (in the rechartering segment), and
2) technical specifics.
For 1, in particular, we need to understand what the specific
"optimizations" are that we want to apply to these protocols -- why
can't we use the MANET protocols as they are and what is the best way
to achieve long-term sustainability in a world where both the
underlying L2 network and the MANET base protocols still are changing.
That's a good idea. I will try to split the presentation.
> 2) Scalability of 6LoWPAN (routing and addressing issues)
> 15 minutes
> In this slot, I would like to raise the issue of the scalability
> with regard to the 6lowpan deliverables. I would like to mention
> the meaning of the scalability in that IPv6 is scalable, but the
> table-based routing (eg. ad hoc routing) is not.
One of the results of the Interim was that we didn't see this as one
of the priority items to be picked up by the WG.
Do you have any new considerations that would lead the people present
at the Interim to reconsider this?
I think that the explanation of this issue at the interim is not enough because of the shortage of time, and we didn't even have a chance to discuss the necessity of this issue. I still believe that this issue is very urgent and should be included in the rechartering items on this round. That's why I want to ask you of the chance to explain the necessity and importance of this issue in this WG session.
> 3) Service Discovery Protocol for 6LoWPAN and Interoperability of
> 6LoWPAN
> 15 minutes
As a result of the Interim, we said we wanted to discuss service
discovery in the context of application configuration and
installation/commissioning.
So, for the rechartering segment, I would be interested in seeing
thoughts on how to achieve this.
At the Interim, there was little that we thought the WG needed to
pick up from the Interoperability presentation.
Again, we should focus on updates since the Interim, and on the
aspects that will influence the charter discussion.
> 4) Demonstration of the testbed (www.6ylowpan.net)
> 15 minutes
Can we do this outside the WG meeting ( e.g., from 08:40 to 08:55 or so)?
I'm very interested in seeing this, but I don't see us spending WG
meeting time on a testbed demonstration.
I think the demonstration of the testbed could be short (just 5 minutes might be OK for the presentation of the architecture and implementation of 6lowpan). If you still think that it might be better to do the demonstration before the WG, it is OK.
Gruesse, Carsten
--
__
Ki-Hyung Kim
Associate Professor
Division of Information and Computer Eng.,
Ajou University, Suwon, Korea 442-749
Tel:+82-31-219-2433, http://ilab.ajou.ac.kr
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
