I'm capturing the input. My list was not intended to be complete, but
just a list from our previous meetings. I was hoping it would just
elicit responses for other items.
I think that we will have many more topics that the WG could reasonably
work on so once we have "a list" I would suggest that we attempt to
prioritize it partially based on perceived need, benefits and also who
is willing to commit to working on it.
Right now we are collecting a list of potential work items. Please send
your requests and thoughts to the list.
geoff
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 21:19 +0200, Wassim Haddad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The list is interesting and I also agree with Gabriel and Samita
> about the bootstrapping item.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Wassim H.
>
>
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, gabriel montenegro wrote:
>
> > Geoff's list below seems to be a summary of the slides at:
>
> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06jul/slides/6lowpan-4/sld1.htm
>
> and in those slides, the bootstrapping item is included along with the ND
> optimizations.
>
> However, I agree with Samita that bootstrapping and ND are separate items.
>
> I suggest adding this item:
>
> Bootstrapping a 6LoWPAN Network
>
> -gabriel
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Samita Chakrabarti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Geoff Mulligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: 6lowpan <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2007 10:53:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [6lowpan] WG rechartering
>
> Hi Geoff,
>
> The list looks good.
>
> Last time we also discussed a need for a document on boot-strapping.
> Is it still on the agenda? Personally I prefer bootstrapping should be a
> separate document; we also have to figure out the requirements for
> bootstrapping in this space.
>
> The second point is on mobility analysis - recently with MANEMO (Network
> mobility for MANET) discussion, some interesting points came out regarding
> 6lowpan mobility. Daniel Park, Jim Bound brought this up and
> we are working on updating
> my expired draft on 6lowpan mobility requirements. So, may be we can keep
> mobility item in the radar if not on the charter list for now.
>
> Thanks,
> -Samita
>
>
> On 2/6/07, Geoff Mulligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Folks,
> > We have reached a milestone. We have submitted the Problem Statement
> > document and the Format Document to our AD for publication. We have
> > completed the original charter of the WG.
> >
> > Mark will review the documents and then submit them for IETF LC (2
> > weeks) and then IESG review and discussion, which will hopefully happen
> > on the IESG telechat on March 8th.
> >
> > So now it is very important that we finalize our thoughts about
> > rechartering the Working Group for new work, should we want to take on
> > new work.
> >
> > Some of the items that people have indicated interest in working on:
> > Neighbor Discovery and Secure Neighbor Discovery (proposed standard)
> > Stateful header compression (informational)
> > 6lowpan applications (informational)
> > mesh routing (proposed standard)
> > Security analysis (informational)
> >
> > If there are other ideas as to work the WG should be looking at, please
> > send them to the list. If you think that we are finished, please send
> > that to the list also.
> >
> > We plan to have a call with our AD next Monday the 12th and I would like
> > to hear from the group before then.
> >
> > geoff
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 6lowpan mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
