Hi all, Regarding our comment on routing requirements in our last e-mail, we would like to clarify our point of view.
We believe RL2N/ROLL should have a set of routing requirements which should satisfy the ones provided by 6LoWPAN. We would like to emphasize that we strongly support the need for 6LoWPAN own routing requirements draft, according to the specificities of 6LoWPAN environments. Best regards, Carles _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
