Hi Mark and all I concur with Carl on this all the way through. What does it take now to move forward with this charter?
Pascal >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of carl williams >Sent: mardi 24 juin 2008 00:21 >To: Mark Townsley (townsley); 'Carsten Bormann' >Cc: '6lowpan' >Subject: Re: [6lowpan] revised new new charter text > > > >Hi Mark and Carsten, > > I agree with the current charter. There was an item that Geoff Mulligan >presented on mobility and sensors at the last IETF 6lowpan meeting. It is >not a priority currently but will be in the future. So it is good that >while the working group keeps on track with current work items that we may >continue to discuss the subject that Geoff raised at the last meeting if >time permits (and we continue to make progress on current agenda items). > > I agree with your proposal for discussing work and thanks for the hard >work on the getting a new charter. > > Carl > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >Of Mark Townsley >Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:02 AM >To: Carsten Bormann >Cc: 6lowpan >Subject: Re: [6lowpan] revised new new charter text > >Carsten Bormann wrote: >> On Jun 19 2008, at 15:00, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote: >> >> >>> The way the charter is worded we can do nothing on these issues >>> because >>> we are not chartered to and that would be distraction to the chartered >>> items. >>> >As long as they are not a distraction, then you can work on whatever you >would like :-) > >In the past (2 or 3 years ago?) I did slap a mandate on this group to >stop talking about unchartered work before the most basic deliverables >were achieved. That time has passed, and the floodgates are open again. >Please contribute and do work on whatever you think is important. I'd >like to take the current charter to the IESG as is if there is consensus >to do so, keeping in mind that as long as you stay on track as a WG, and >as long as the discussion of unchartered work isn't seemingly holding up >progress on chartered work, you can discuss and work on whatever you >wish on this list and in the WG meetings. > >Thanks, > >- Mark >> Pascal, >> >> this is not the way we want to work here -- the charter items are the >> ones we *promise* to deliver; but we do have a maintenance item in >> there, and we can use that to build problem statements and even >> solutions. >> >> In other words, I would look forward to a session slot in Dublin where >> we can make progress on this. >> But I don't want to hold up the charter now. >> >> Gruesse, Carsten >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 6lowpan mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >6lowpan mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > >_______________________________________________ >6lowpan mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
