As Alex mentioned, I think it is a right time to discuss the 6lowpan MIB as a WG item. I want to ask for a working group consensus on this.
__ Ki-Hyung Kim Associate Professor, Ajou University, Korea, Tel: +82-31-219-2433, Cel: +82-10-4760-2551 On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 19:10, Alexandru Petrescu < [email protected]> wrote: > Hamid Mukhtar a écrit : > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Alexandru Petrescu< >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Brian Frank a écrit : >>> >>>> I think an UDP-based application level protocol that works well >>>> over 6LoWPANs and with sleeping nodes is a sorely lacking >>>> feature. However, I am not sure SNMP is the best starting point. >>>> >>>> >>> Is there a MIB (Management Information Base) effort for 6LoWPAN ND? >>> It may be too early... but MIB is necessary. >>> >>> >> 6LoWPAN MIB has already been there for a while. >> > > Do you mean draft-daniel-6lowpan-mib-00.txt? > > It doesn't seem to be in the list of WG items: > > The document name you specified, "draft-ietf-6lowpan", matched multiple >> documents: >> >> sort by date sort by name >> >> 04 Apr 2007 draft-ietf-6lowpan-format >> 08 Dec 2008 draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc >> 27 May 2009 draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd >> 02 Mar 2007 draft-ietf-6lowpan-problem >> 25 Mar 2009 draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements >> 09 Mar 2009 draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases >> >> Found 6 matches. >> > > The 6LoWPAN Charter doesn't seem to mention it either. > > Alex > > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan >
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
