As Alex mentioned, I think it is a right time to discuss the 6lowpan MIB as
a WG item.
I want to ask for a working group consensus on this.

__
Ki-Hyung Kim
Associate Professor, Ajou University, Korea,
Tel: +82-31-219-2433, Cel: +82-10-4760-2551


On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 19:10, Alexandru Petrescu <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hamid Mukhtar a écrit :
>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Alexandru Petrescu<
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Brian Frank a écrit :
>>>
>>>> I think an UDP-based application level protocol that works well
>>>> over 6LoWPANs and with sleeping nodes is a sorely lacking
>>>> feature.  However, I am not sure SNMP is the best starting point.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Is there a MIB (Management Information Base) effort for 6LoWPAN ND?
>>> It may be too early... but MIB is necessary.
>>>
>>>
>> 6LoWPAN MIB has already been there for a while.
>>
>
> Do you mean draft-daniel-6lowpan-mib-00.txt?
>
> It doesn't seem to be in the list of WG items:
>
>  The document name you specified, "draft-ietf-6lowpan", matched multiple
>> documents:
>>
>>    sort by date sort by name
>>
>>    04 Apr 2007  draft-ietf-6lowpan-format
>>    08 Dec 2008  draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc
>>    27 May 2009  draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd
>>    02 Mar 2007  draft-ietf-6lowpan-problem
>>    25 Mar 2009  draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements
>>    09 Mar 2009  draft-ietf-6lowpan-usecases
>>
>>    Found 6 matches.
>>
>
> The 6LoWPAN Charter doesn't seem to mention it either.
>
> Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to