On Feb 19, 2010, at 20:41, Dario Tedeschi wrote:

> compressed headers spanning multiple RFC4944 fragments presents huge 
> complexities in re-assembly

My first reaction would be "don't do that, then!".
(http://catb.org/jargon/html/D/Don-t-do-that-then-.html)

I don't think that 4944 specifies anything that lets you have the compressed 
header extend beyond the first frame.
I'm not sure we explicitly discussed this, but certainly I didn't see a need.

If we now do, I'd like to first learn more about this use case.

Gruesse, Carsten

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to