Geoff,
I do not support draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-06 for IESG submission until
there is a resolution for:
A) The forward compatibility issues raised by Richard Kelsey, and
B) The use of fragmentation when compressed headers extend beyond the
first fragment, or an explicit statement that compressed headers must
fit within the first fragment.
Thanks,
Owen Kirby
Geoff Mulligan wrote:
Folks,
I realized that I have made a huge slip-up. The HC draft has languished for
the past few months.
At the meeting in Hiroshima we said that we would last call this draft, but I
failed to send out the
actual last call. So...
This note formally starts the WG Last Call for comments on
draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-06, "Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams in 6LoWPAN
Networks".
The document can be found at:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-06.txt
The document is intended to be submitted by this Working Group to the
IESG for publication as a Standards Track document.
Please review the document carefully (one last time), and send your
comments to the 6lowpan list. Please also indicate in your response
whether or not you think this document is ready to go to the IESG.
Because of my gaffe this Last Call will end Wednesday February 24 2010
at 2359 UTC.
Thanks,
Geoff
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
