> > > If that is not a problem, then maybe we can just state that thou MUST > > NOT compress outside fragment 1. > > This is what I thought we were converging on? > [Pascal] Agreed, as long as the restriction applies to the existing fragmentation (4944). We cannot presume that this restriction will still be required for upcoming methods. It will be up to those new methods to specify whether they need that restriction or not.
Pascal _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
