Hi Daniel,

A single Context Info option (CO) is needed indeed for a 6lowpan network for
consistency, I agree.
If this is not clear, we would clarify - perhaps in the assumption section.

Thanks,
-Samita

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Daniel Gavelle
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 4:25 AM
> To: Zach Shelby
> Cc: 6lowpan
> Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Size of NS+ARO+SLLAO in nd-10
> 
> If there are multiple LBR's, with different PIO's, the network still needs
a
> single CO.  For example, a possible Smart Grid network would be to have:
An
> LBR in the meter with a PIO of the back haul to the utility and a prefix
> assigned by the utility.  A second LBR in a broadband router with general
> access to the Internet and a prefix assigned by an ISP.  The LBRs would
need
> to be configured to cooperate correctly so there is only one set of
context
> information in the network but each LBR may be advertising a different
PIO.
> 
> I am not sure in this case if both LBRs advertise both PIO's or each
> advertises its own PIO.  If both advertise both PIOs, the optimisation is
> lost and the CO needs to be carried explicitly.  If each just advertises
its
> own PIO, there is potential for confusion as two different default COs may
> be derived.
> 
> Daniel.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > We really can't mess with PIO, but how about this. We make a rule that
is
> a single PIO is present in an RA, then it is assumed that this is CID=0 by
> default.
> >
> 
> --
> __________________________________________________
> Daniel Gavelle, Software Engineer
> Tel: +44 114 281 2655
> Fax: +44 114 281 2951
> Jennic Ltd, Furnival Street, Sheffield, S1 4QT, UK Comp Reg No: 3191371
> Registered In England http://www.jennic.com
> __________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan



_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to