OK, thanks, Don. - Ralph
On Jul 7, 2010, at 3:08 PM 7/7/10, [email protected] wrote: > Not quite. There is any internal copy but we need to remove vendor names to > publish. > > Don > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralph Droms <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 15:01:06 > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: 6lowpan 6lowpan<[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [6lowpan] ND-10 Status > > Don - sorry if I missed it; have you posted the interoperability report from > the interop event? > > - Ralph > > On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:45 PM 6/25/10, Don Sturek wrote: > >> I am sending this note on behalf of the ZigBee IP team to ask about the >> status of ND-10. Here is what we have planned: >> 1) There is a ZigBee IP interop event scheduled for next week. We >> plan to have at least 5 implementations and to test ND-10. >> 2) We will create a report and send to the 6LowPAN reflector >> highlighting any issues we see. >> >> However, we would like to see some commitment on bringing this topic to >> closure in the WG. >> >> I have not seen too many e-mail threads on ND-10 other than the header >> option ordering. Are there other issues? Assuming implementations go well, >> what does everyone see the time to LC as? >> >> Don >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 6lowpan mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
