#95: IESG comment #4 - SHOULD/MUST about secure delivery support
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: carle...@… | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: routing-requirements | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Sec 5.4: Why isn't a MUST support secure delivery? To me, SHOULD means
the protocol might not support the option of secure delivery/transport.
That is a bad thing in my book. If you make it MUST support then it's
built-in when you need it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/6lowpan/trac/ticket/95>
6lowpan <http://tools.ietf.org/6lowpan/>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
