#108: IESG comment #17 (by Adrian Farrel) - Clarification about the need of Fig.
4
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: carle...@… | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: routing-requirements | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
It is not appropriate for an Informational requirements document to
take a position on which solutions my be adequate or to give PDU
specifications.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6lowpan/trac/ticket/108>
6lowpan <http://tools.ietf.org/6lowpan/>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
