On Jul 26, 2010, at 13:22, Colin O'Flynn wrote: > Hello, > > I was only able to listen remotely, and missed the first little bit of the > meeting.
Again, apologies to the remote participants. > However I see mention of support for some form of ICMPv6 compression for ND > and keeping 6lowpan-nd as-is. Indeed, see also slide 10 to 13. > Will this be added to the charter? As then we could select the approach to be > supported, be it the generic compression or ICMPv6-specific. I think we should spin (or, actually submit for the first time and then spin) the documents for a while as individual Internet-Drafts. Once they are fully cooked, we can then do the selection of the approach, and adopt one as a WG document. Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
