#103: IESG comment #12 (by Tim Polk) - Coexistence of Mesh Under and Route Over
in the same LoWPAN
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
 Reporter:  carle...@…              |        Owner:        
     Type:  enhancement             |       Status:  closed
 Priority:  minor                   |    Milestone:        
Component:  routing-requirements    |      Version:        
 Severity:  -                       |   Resolution:  fixed 
 Keywords:                          |  
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Changes (by carle...@…):

  * status:  new => closed
  * resolution:  => fixed


Comment:

 This scenario is technically possible, but 6LoWPAN is unlikely to be
 implemented as a hybrid scenario. This hybrid scenario can increase
 complexity of nodes because they have to contain both solutions.
 Simplicity is a very important feature in 6LoWPAN. We haven't seen any
 interest in hybrid scenarios in deployment cases.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6lowpan/trac/ticket/103#comment:1>
6lowpan <http://tools.ietf.org/6lowpan/>

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to