Hi Robert, > > On 07/19/10 07:54 AM, Robert Cragie wrote: > > Hi Samita, > > > > I'm still confused by this. Earlier, Zach said that in fact we should > > not be using GP16 in the src IP address of the NS. I totally agree. > > However, there is now some talk of setting the SLLA option to be the > > 16-bit address of the device attempting address registration. This is > > also surely wrong? We should be carrying the tentative 16-bit address > > in the ARO, not in any other field. Then it only becomes a real > > address (MAC or IP) when it is fully confirmed it is not a duplicate. > > The SLLAO needs to be a link-layer address that can be used to send the > success/failure of the registration, hence using the possibly duplicate > 16 bit MAC address wouldn't work. > > Erik
[SC>] Sorry, I missed this email earlier. Have we resolved this question now with the new update in the nd-draft with tentative NCEs? I am actually a bit confused about using MAC-16 bit address. At what point is ZigBee planning to start using 16bit-MAC address? At the start of ND operation? Thanks, -Samita _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
