Dear authors, The document looks rather complete and comprehensive.
There are a few questions: Do I understand correctly that contrary to RFC 4861, the neighbor cache is always empty in 6LN. If true, this remark may be added to Registration term of section 2. >From that do I deduce correctly that access to the link for link-local >addresses (LLA) involves extracting the MAC address from the LLA. MUST a 6LBR be present in an isolated LOWPAN? (6LBR text in section 2 seems to imply this) Assuming an isolated LOWPAN without 6LR or 6LBR, then there will be no answer to the RS message, but the node can continue sending messages to LLA, where the MAC address is again extracted from the LLA. Is that correct? Peter Peter van der Stok Philips Research Laboratories Eindhoven High Tech Campus HTC 34 (WB) 1-067 5656 AA Eindhoven The Netherlands phone +31 40 2749657 Fax: + 31 40 2746321 mailto: [email protected] ________________________________ The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
