Hello, I just wanted to make sure it was publically recorded that what Carsten says is accurate. I consider the GHC draft a much better replacement for the ICMPv6-specific one. I have no plans on continuing work for the ICMPv6-specific one, indeed it is already out of date with the ND draft.
Regards, -Colin -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann Sent: March 1, 2011 8:30 AM To: Geoff Mulligan Cc: 6lowpan Subject: Re: [6lowpan] agenda for upcoming IETF It seems to me we will spend some time in Prague discussing the resolution of the ND-15 WGLC comments. (The WGLC ends on 2011-03-03, and the deadline for submission of an I-D update (non-00) is 2011-03-14.) Colin has said the GHC draft has essentially replaced his ICMP-specific one. I plan to submit a version of that draft that supplies text for the discovery/negotiation that was still outstanding in the version discussed in Beijing. (There also was some hallway discussion about ASCII compression -- I'll include something very simple, which we may or may not want to throw out again. Does anyone have nice packet samples for evaluating that?) Declaring victory after that sounds like an option. Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
