Alex, Do you really have a point to make in this discussion? You are all over the map with zero value.
-Raj On 4/1/11 4:45 PM, "ext Alexandru Petrescu" <[email protected]> wrote: >As a side note, > >I wonder why people prefer to work for IPv6 over BT-LE > instead of IPv6 over ANT+ >? > >ANT+ is a very low power link layer technology very well adapted for the >scenario depicted in the bt-le use case scenario (page 50 of >http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/80/slides/6lowpan-0.pdf) > >BT-LE and ANT+ technologies seem to compete in a certain market segment >related to PAN. > >I am asking because, from where I look, IMHO, ANT+ does seem to get some >tract among manufacturers of these devices. > >Alex >_______________________________________________ >6lowpan mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
