#138: Adrian Farrel's DISCUSS comments and Suggestions
Comment (by zach@…):
Regarding Adrian's comments on too-many options and sub-options
(especially for 6LRs), the proposed solution is:
- For 6LRs make s/SHOULD/MUST, in practice remove options. Use a common
style to make it clear that a routing algorithm can substitute some
mechanisms with its own (and which options can be substituted).
- Similar language in RFC4861 that if a router implements a routing
protocol, this may override some mechanisms defined for 6LRs.
- Need to define what subtitutable means, introduced in Section 1.5.
--
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Reporter: samita.chakrabarti@… | Owner: samita.chakrabarti@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: nd-discusses
Component: nd | Version: 1.0
Severity: - | Resolution:
Keywords: |
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/6lowpan/trac/ticket/138#comment:2>
6lowpan <http://tools.ietf.org/6lowpan/>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
