good catch! I believe the ranges should be 0-127, and 128-255.
@Xavi, @Qin, agreed? Thomas On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Yasuyuki Tanaka < yatch1.tan...@toshiba.co.jp> wrote: > Hi, > > I found a conflict between the ranges defined in Figure 29 of > draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-06: > > +-----------+------------------------------+ > | Range | Registration Procedures | > +-----------+------------------------------+ > | 0-128 | IETF Review or IESG Approval | > | 128-255 | Expert Review | > +-----------+------------------------------+ > > Figure 29: SF Identifier (SFID): Registration Procedures. > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol- > 06#section-8.2.5 > > Which registration procedure is needed for SFID 128? > > Best, > Yatch > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > -- _______________________________________ Thomas Watteyne, PhD Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH www.thomaswatteyne.com _______________________________________
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list 6tisch@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
