Since I had the discussion privately, minimal security and edhoc were discussed 
at 6TiSCH at pretty much every meeting, plenary or interim, since around IETF 
97.

The minutes for an IETF are located in 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-xx-6tisch/ where xx is the IETF number.
See for instance IETF 98 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-98-6tisch/; 
one can also google 
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=6tisch+minutes+edhoc
There was also a side meeting at IETF 103, all reported in the minutes 
https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/meetings/wiki/181108_ietf103_bangkok

One may also consult the minutes from the 6TiSCH WiKi  
https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/meetings/wiki/browse/ where all are stored since 
inception of the WG.

All the best,

Pascal

From: Mališa Vučinić <[email protected]>
Sent: lundi 1 avril 2019 11:59
To: Thomas Watteyne <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; 6tisch <[email protected]>; 6tisch-chairs 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] EDHOC Summary

+1

We are happy to contribute to this effort through feedback on the design, 
implementation for constrained devices and its evaluation in 6TiSCH networks.

Mališa

On 30 Mar 2019, at 18:31, Thomas Watteyne 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

The 6TiSCH WG has produced a set of documents [1,2] that specify the use of 
OSCORE to secure message exchanges at the application layer including network 
access. At the side meeting in Prague two years ago involving several ADs and 
WG chairs, the 6TiSCH chairs have indicated the need for an efficient 
authenticated key exchange protocol that we could use during the network access 
to key OSCORE. We have also restated this request at the SECDISPATCH interim a 
couple of weeks ago.

The EDHOC specification was discussed on numerous occasions during the 6TiSCH 
working group meetings and the approach on using it for the extension of [1] 
towards zero-touch [3] deployments had a wide consensus. We welcome the work in 
this area to be done, and strongly support any decision of the security ADs 
that leads to the fast progress of this specification.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture/
[3] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6tisch-dtsecurity-zerotouch-join/

_______________________________________________
Secdispatch mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to