Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com> wrote:
    > I'm looking for a consensus on how to address the following review
    > comment on the 6TiSCH Architecture by Benjamin:

    >> It would be good to see some architectural discussion about key
    >> management
    >> for the link-layer keys.  (Given that 802.15.4 leaves key management
    >> as out of
    >> scope, it is clearly our problem.)  Thus far I don't even have a sense
    >> for when it is
    >> possible to rotate a network's keys.

    PT> I'll take that to a separate thread with Michael, Tero and Malisa. It
    PT> is certainly possible to rotate keys. We had a draft about rekeying
    PT> that went stale. We isolated cases where this is desirable in the
    PT> discussion on the minimal security draft. I'm unclear how deep we
    PT> need to go in this regards vs. what belongs to the minimal security
    PT> specification.

6tisch-minimal-security has a section 8.2 "Parameter Update Exchange"
Maybe it should include "(and Rekey)"

We further have section 8.4.3.1 and 8.4.3.2 to explain how to use that
to rekey the entire network.

I'm not sure what's in the Architecture document about this, but I'd
rather that it just said less.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
6tisch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch

Reply via email to