Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com> wrote: > I'm looking for a consensus on how to address the following review > comment on the 6TiSCH Architecture by Benjamin:
>> It would be good to see some architectural discussion about key >> management >> for the link-layer keys. (Given that 802.15.4 leaves key management >> as out of >> scope, it is clearly our problem.) Thus far I don't even have a sense >> for when it is >> possible to rotate a network's keys. PT> I'll take that to a separate thread with Michael, Tero and Malisa. It PT> is certainly possible to rotate keys. We had a draft about rekeying PT> that went stale. We isolated cases where this is desirable in the PT> discussion on the minimal security draft. I'm unclear how deep we PT> need to go in this regards vs. what belongs to the minimal security PT> specification. 6tisch-minimal-security has a section 8.2 "Parameter Update Exchange" Maybe it should include "(and Rekey)" We further have section 8.4.3.1 and 8.4.3.2 to explain how to use that to rekey the entire network. I'm not sure what's in the Architecture document about this, but I'd rather that it just said less. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6tisch mailing list 6tisch@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch