This is actually something I am very interested in as well. If a persistent version of Acme (-SAC) was available it would completely obviate my use of screen. Would something like this be feasible outside of Octopus as well?
--underspecified On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Tim Wiess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> this slashdot article almost asks for cpu >>> functionality for plan 9 by name. >>> >>> http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/08/06/29/1417247.shtml >>> >>> not a single mention of plan 9. i hope >>> this is an indication that slashdot has >>> slipped. >>> >>> screens? 1978 called and wants its >>> terminal server mentality back. >>> >>> - erik >> >> cpu is not persistent, at least not in the way >> he wants it. > > Yeah, seems like the poster is more interested in something similar to > what Octopus give you. > > >
