On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 15:00 -0400, erik quanstrom wrote: > my inclination would be to give 9vx a proper > ethernet device, but that idea has been discussed > already.
I was about to ask this very question (and say THANK YOU to Russ for another awesome piece of software), but now that you've mentioned it could you, please, elaborate on why implementing proper ethernet was rejected? Thanks, Roman. P.S. Either that or just a pointer to the existing discussion ;-)
