hola, I got the tip from rog's post to affect rio's ns, plumber's actually.
http://9fans.net/archive/2005/02/171 On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Rudolf Sykora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2008/10/3 andrey mirtchovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> i sometimes wonder whether the ^F completion stuff wasn't left this >> way on purpose, as if to illustrate the futility of (essentially) a >> single-node solution in the presence of distributed environments. >> >> to solve what you perceive to be a problem you must ask yourself: what >> is the one thing that is fully aware of the current namespace? it's >> obviously not rio: it simply juggles windows with shells in them. is >> it the shell? putting the completion in the shell itself would work >> for plain terminals, but wouldn't work for rio. is it the kernel? >> would you bother adding to the kernel something as silly as command >> completion? how about completing across a network? >> >> all difficult questions for a silly problem ;) > > I might again be wrong, but I thought the reason why the completion is not > in the rc is partially thanks to the fact, that rc doesn't know anything you > type until you press 'enter'. Only rio knows. (But all this is based only on > my possibly broken opinion...) > But yes, the best would be (for me and I guess for everybody, since we > usually speak to rc when we need the completion) to be as close to the rc's > namespace as possible. > Correct me, please, if I am completely off the road... :) > > Ruda > > -- Federico G. Benavento
