Hi Russ! First of all -- thanks a lot for answering.
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 09:24 -0700, Russ Cox wrote: > > somehow it dawned on me that plan9port lacks > > an application to serve a local filesystem > > over 9P. Is this on purpose? Am I missing > > something fundamental that would allow > > for a moral equivalent of exportfs? > > I pull things in as they are needed. > I have not needed to serve 9P. > Adding u9fs sounds reasonable, but of > course it is already in Unix-compilable > form elsewhere. Of course, although the utility of plan9port as a one stop shop for everything Plan9 on UNIX platforms is quite significant. Hence the question -- would you be in favor of continue adding things as needed. And if so, what kind of of groundwork would you expect from the contributors? Thanks, Roman. P.S. I see that sqweek has the 9pcon and (not to overcommit myself ;-)) I also might be able to contribute things like u9fs and nfsserver.
