On Thu Dec 18 16:58:02 EST 2008, ano...@gmail.com wrote: > i've look through the changes and am not clear on how the sb700 will > be handled. it sounded like you were saying all the sb[67]xx chips are > handled the same, but the did is different (439D). it it just a matter > of adding it to the big switch(p->vid) statement?
you don't need to. if the vid is amd's, several chipsets are recognized as Tsb600 (sic) and the rest are recognized as Tunk via the fallthrough match on the device type/subtype/pi. there is no special handling of Tsb600, so Tunk is equivalent, but the boot message will be a bit odd. - erik
