On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 20:47 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> i apologize for the silly question, but
> my p9p-fu is quite weak.
> 
> is the reason that plan 9 import is not
> part of p9p other than it was not needed?
> (of course the ssh-based import is included,
> but i believe that is something else entirely.)
> 
> i'm not dead set on import, but i do require
> authentication and will be talking to a cpu
> server, not a fs.

I had a very similar question about export (and there's
a chance I'll port it for some of the stuff that I do)
so not having import provides a nice symmetry at least ;-)

Thanks,
Roman.


Reply via email to