On Tue Mar 17 18:29:14 EDT 2009, urie...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks martin for your analysis, this makes some sense to me, but as I
> pointed out, even setting ifs to () doesn't solve the issue, so it
> would be nice to find a solution to this.
>
> Right now having the output of `{} corrupted can be quite inconvenient...
it is unreasonable to expect to be able to generate tokens
that are bigger than 8k. however, the '8' should not
be dropped. i would think this small change would be worth
consideration.
; diffy -c havefork.c
/n/dump/2009/0317/sys/src/cmd/rc/havefork.c:74,80 - havefork.c:74,80
Xbackq(void)
{
char wd[8193];
- int c;
+ int c, trunc;
char *s, *ewd=&wd[8192], *stop;
struct io *f;
var *ifs = vlook("ifs");
/n/dump/2009/0317/sys/src/cmd/rc/havefork.c:105,113 - havefork.c:105,116
while((c = rchr(f))!=EOF){
if(strchr(stop, c) || s==ewd){
if(s!=wd){
+ trunc = s == ewd;
*s='\0';
v = newword(wd, v);
s = wd;
+ if(trunc)
+ *s++ = c;
}
}
else *s++=c;
- erik
