2009/3/20 Francisco J Ballesteros <n...@lsub.org>: > El 20/03/2009, a las 14:07, rogpe...@gmail.com escribió: >> so you end up with a smart client or split application, >> which lack the same easy composability that you get >> from plan 9's remote devices.
perhaps i should have written "generality and easy composability" there. i'm sure it's possible to make easily composable applications with other metaphors (octupus being one example) but is it possible to do so without making some strong assumptions about the user-interaction model of the application?
