Not productive huh? That why not even Tiger reads the list anymore. But I read mail from you.
brucee On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:48 PM, <j...@csplan9.rit.edu> wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Devon H. O'Dell <devon.od...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> 2009/4/16 erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net>: >>>> On Thu Apr 16 22:18:35 EDT 2009, devon.od...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> > i just stated what i thought the historical situation was. the >>>>> > point was only that changing direction will be difficult. >>>>> >>>>> This thread certainly proves that :) >>>> >>>> a 9fans thread proves nothing. >>> >>> Conceptually, anyway. Why is everyone always so hell-bent on >>> hair-splitting? :P >> >> So much code, so much precision, so much specificity in dealing with >> computers. It often spreads outside of the computational context and >> into one's personality. >> > > I'd think less that than the well-documented 9fans discussion process: > 1. Someone brings up an idea > 2. Half the list explains why it's bad > 3. Trolling > 4. Deciding on what is most "plan 9-ish" > 5. No code is ever implemented by anyone > > > > John > > >
