2009/4/23 Fco. J. Ballesteros <n...@lsub.org>: > But if you do that (send sequences from userl-level) > you must interpret your namespace yourself. When I tried to > detect how to bundle calls for plan b, a problem I had was > namec. For me it's still not clear how to detect cleanly > `what to batch', even if you change the source for the > program doing I/O to help there, because of the mount > table.
i guess that the current design of the walk message shows what can be batched, but i agree, the mount table is at the core of the issue. i wonder how many things would break if plan 9 moved to a strictly name-based mapping for its mount table...
